Ethical System Table

Directions 1. Fill in brief definitions of each native ethical opening. 2. Identify alternate names or variations of each ethical system ground on your reading of the text and supplemental materials. Match the real-world examples listed below with the corresponding systems. The first unrivalled has been completed for you in the t fit. a. I look at the gr wipe out unwashed should be commensurate to eat mainstay if they like the taste of it. b. I believe that if grit is going to be eaten, it should be available for everyone to eat. c. I believe bulk should be able to eat sand because it is the right thing to do. . I believe people should be able to eat sand because it is tidy for ones health. e. I believe people should be able to eat sand if they decide they want to, regardless of whether it is someone elses sand. f. I believe people should be able to eat sand if they want to because they are free to make the decision themselves. g. I believe I will eat sand because it is the standard meal for my community. 3. Develop your own workplace example that fits with each system. Present each workplace scenario in a substantial paragraph of close to 40 words.Although the table field will expand to accommodate your workplace examples, you whitethorn list them at the end of the table make a note in the table to see the attached examples, however, so your facilitator knows to look for scenarios below the table. 4. Format references according to APA standards and include them after the table. Ethical Theory or skeleton Definition Other Names for Theory Real-world ExampleWorkplace Example System Duty-based Ethics no matter of consequences, Deontology, pluralism, C It is my duty to follow through with certain object lesson principles are moral rights, rights-basedI believe people instructions my boss gives me, even if I binding, focusing on duty rather should be able to do not agree with the concept.It is my than results or moral obligation Categoric al imperative eat sand because moral obligation to respect authority over what the individual would it is the right figures. prefer to do (Trevino & Nelson, Golden rule thing to do. 2007, Ch. 4). In ethics, deontological ethics, or deontology (Greek deon meaning obligation or duty), is a theory holding that decisions should be made solely or primarily by considering ones duties and the rights of others.Some systems are based on biblical or tenets from sacred. Consequence-based an ethical decision should Consequentialist Theories B Ethics maximize benefits to society and I believe that if I know that we signed a contract for a big minimize harms.What matters is Utilitarianism sand is going to new client but we cant announce it until the net balance of good be eaten, it next month. The benefits to morale of the consequences over bad (Trevino & should be company and employees outweigh the Nelson, 2007, Ch. 4). ava ilable for consequences of make an early everyone to eat. announcement. I should make the announcement. Rights-based Ethics Rights are considered to be Contractarianism A ethically correct and logical since Social Contract I believe people Employees have the right to expect a natural rubber a large or ruling population should be able to working environment since that is range of endorses them (Ridley, 1998). eat sand if they the social contract in modern America. like the taste of it. Human temperament Ethics Ethical values that are hard coded D into people as being take off of the Common Courtesy I believe people A co-worker has the need to switch shifts gentle race. Natural tendencies should be able to to care for a sick family member. If the instead of man-made law for devising eat sand because other individual doesnt have a pressing decisions. it is good for exponentiation it would be nice to switch the ones health. shift and h elp them out. Relativistic Ethics example disagreements are caused by Moral Relativism F the fact that everyone in theory I believe people Based on the position someone has in a is right in their own way. When in Rome, do as the should be able to company it may not be appropriate for them Individuals save have to be true Romans do. eat sand if they to have visible piercings or tattoos when to themselves and no one else. want to because a more professional demeanor needs to be they are free to maintained. Others may be able to since it make the decision doesnt affect their performance or the themselves. company consider in their position. Entitlement-based E Ethics I believe people should be able to eat sand if they decide they want to, regardless of whether it is someone elses sand. Virtue-based ethics The virtue ethics approach focuses fraternity ethics, G The quality control team in our company m ore on the integrity of the moralprofessional I believe I will has to carry regimen handlers and safety actor than on the moral act responsibility eat sand because cards. I should be able to trust that food itself.In virtue ethics, The Disclosure Rule it is the standardprovided as sample meets the standards of character is very more than defined by meal for my the guidelines that they accepted when ones community (Trevino & Nelson, community. getting that certification. 2007, Ch. 4). Reference Trevino, L. K. , & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Managing argumentation ethics Straight talk about how to do it right (4th ed. ). Hoboken, NJ Wiley. Ridley, Aaron. (1998). Beginning Bioethics. New York St. Martins Press.