How to Deal with Moral Differences :: Papers Ethics Morality

How to Deal with Moral Differences The counterbalance counseling is to believe there are no honorablely discipline or wrong viewpoints. The honorable issue is just a ethnical game and neither your opinions or mine matters.Therefore there is no right or wrong. This view is called virtuous nihilism. Related to this psyche is clean skepticism, which holds that we give the bouncet know anymoral truths, and moral subjectivism, which holds that moral views aremerely inner states in a person and that they throw outt be compared to the innerstates of another person. However believing in the above solves no problems,if nobody is right and nobody is wrong.The second way is to believe that there is no universal truth, that each culturehas its protest set of rules that are valid and apply to that culture, they dontstep in with our rules and we dont interfere with theirs, this is called ethicalrelativism. This article of belief is viewed as an military position of toleran ce. This belief solvesconflicts in the idea that whatever the majority deems to be the moral rule isthe rule to follow.The third belief is that deep down in spite of all the cultures differences we callall still agree on a certain moral basics, that people everywhere have basicallythe same human nature and that we just adapt it into our environment, thisidea is called Soft Universalism. Universalism because it perceives that thereare some universal moral rules touchy because it is not as radical as harduniversalism. This belief can solve problems because its main goal is to seekcommon ground beneath the variety of opinions and mores.The fourth belief is called hard universalism, this is the absolute opposite ofmoral nihilism stating that there is only one universal moral code. This beliefsolves problems with hard evidence and reason.Problems with Ethical Relativism(1) No Criticism or extolment of Other Cultures, we need to criticize or praise othercultures morality to mai ntain our own moral integrity.(2) Majority Rule, the idea of the majority perpetually being right is just not rational.(3) Professed or Actual morality? this is the idea that a certain kind of behavior is median(prenominal), but what is normal? for example when a group was asked aboutinfidelity the majority was against it but when the same group was asked if theyhad committed it, the majority had.(4) What is a Majority? In the instance of euthanasia if a law is passed tomorrow