Moving to Another Country Essay

Tradition is existing experience. A usage is a group of related ideas that fill proceeded for a extensive time. In any(prenominal) cases community start out spent that time test to mitigate the ideas. Well call that a dynamic tradition because it changes over time. In other cases, the focus has been on keeping the tradition exactly the equivalent over time. Well call that a static tradition because it does non change. Although these approaches atomic number 18 contradictory, about traditions be mixed. Dynamic traditions are important because they contain whatever of our best knowledge. Today, they contain only the best ideas any participants have view of in the whole history of the tradition. I bustt immoral they are perfect, but if they missed a good idea, it was despite pecks efforts, not intentional. They do a pretty good transmission line of gathering the best ideas, and keeping those around, and discarding ideas that are discovered to be mistaken.The cre ator dynamic traditions are especially invaluable is the sheer amount of thought, condemnation and error correction that has gone into them from more volume. Just because traditions contain valuable knowledge doesnt mean they are always right. Sometimes they arent. I shouldnt skirt to traditions just because a lot of smart large number didnt see any way to modify them further. I should defer if I dont see any way to improve them further. If I make up a parvenue idea, and I dont see any way to improve it further (in 20 minutes of thought), and then its not particularly reliable. I could substantially have missed mostthing. With a tradition, perhaps thousands of pile put in twenty minutes of thought, and some others put in years, so however if I dont see any way to improve things, and even if I dont know much closely the subject, it has an advantage over just making something up myself. each(prenominal) the knowledge in traditions can be intimidating. And no one has tim e to cautiously and critically go through all the details of all the traditionalistic knowledge they use. Thats OK. But one should bear in estimate two things. First, if something goes wrong if there seems to be a problem then relying on tradition isnt good enough. Its not solveing, and youll postulate to tweak something or find another tradition. And second, a thoughtful psyche should critically evaluate some traditions. Its your choice which, but everyone ought to be good at something and have the experience of trying to improve some knowledge. Everyone should put some serious thought into some area. at that place isnt much point to life if I dont staidly cogitate about some parts of it. In the case of a disagreement, anappeal to tradition is invalid. The tradition might be wrong and someone thinks it is. To address that disagreement, I have to consider their criticism of the tradition, any secondary ideas they have, and any arguments in favor of the traditional idea, a nd then try to work out what is true. Traditions containing peoples best ideas of the past wont always be the best ideas anyone thinks of in the future. The biggest value of traditions is they can ofttimes give useful ideas that are not controversial, or starting points which partially solve problems. In a disagreement, although we cant say, This is true because a lot of smart people didnt see anything wrong with it, and who are you to say they missed something? the fact that something is a tradition is not orthogonal either. Dynamic traditions have, over the years, faced a lot of criticism. They often already include explanations of why common criticisms of the tradition are mistaken. Major traditions have existing literature that provides arguments and ideas on the subject. This literature can answer many another(prenominal) disagreements, which are often make in ignorance. When we find something wrong with a tradition, if at all possible we should improve the tradition, not aba ndon it. We should seek a way to modify the tradition but also view as existing knowledge.To keep the most existing knowledge, our change should be as small as possible to solve the problem. If we were to start over from scratch, we whitethorn avoid the flaw we found, but were not perfect and our new ideas will contain other flaws. And new ideas wont have the benefit of decades or centuries of people trying to find and correct flaws. We should consequently be respectful of tradition even as we find errors in it, and try to improve it with new ideas of our own. passive traditions are different. Although theyve been around a long time, no one has been trying to find mistakes in them, so they arent very useful. Nor are they innocuous. Consider why does the static tradition still exist? Why didnt it disappear after its schoolmaster advocates died? With a dynamic tradition, its passed on to the next generation because people find it useful, and teach it. A static tradition, too, must have some mechanism for being passed on. But it cant be that people voluntarily learn it due to its usefulness. Because it never changes, and never corrects errors, its not very useful. Instead, people must in some way be tricked or fooled into it, or indoctrinated, or forced, or brainwashed. Often they are pressured, and madeto feel bad, sinful or guilty if they do not copy the tradition.But controlling peoples emotions is difficult. Because people are fanciful and will try to defend themselves, it takes a lot of knowledge to reliably control or manipulate them. Where does that knowledge come from? Static traditions are not actually entirely static. The main ideas, doctrine or belief is kept constant. But the way of passing it on changes. The more people try to preserve the tradition unchanged, and make sure it will last forever, the more creativity they put into mechanisms for transmitting the tradition to the next generation. All traditions face a survival effect. For a tra dition to last, it has to be passed on from older people to younger people. But only so many ideas can be taught to the next generation. Children are only in school, and in their parents home, for so many years. The amount of ideas is large, but its limited. Only a certain amount of tradition can fit. Only the ones that are disclose at being passed on will make the cutoff. Dynamic traditions make out by being as useful as possible. Thus the alternative effect pushes them to be better and better.They try to be true, and people uniform the truest ones so much that they teach them to children. Static traditions compete differently. They cant compete with good ideas directly, so they use other approaches such as manipulating or controlling people. In short, in some way they handicap the persons creativity so he doesnt carry out the tradition is low on useful truth content, and doesnt think of alternative ideas against which a static tradition cant compete. The selection effect for static traditions makes them worse, not better. Any static tradition that fails to shit a permanent blind spot in the person runs a serious risk that one day hell realize its not a great tradition and doesnt have a lot of useful knowledge. And if he realizes that, whether he ever changes his mind or improves himself, what he wont want to do is teach it to his kids. There will never come a time when his children have some problem or question, and he thinks if he teaches them this tradition it will sponsor them, since he knows it is not useful. Traditions are important because they contain our best knowledge collected over the years. But they can also be dangerous. Static traditions that induce blind spots in people and are unreal at everything except getting themselves taught to children. It is up to us to consider which traditions are which.