Marxism vs Functionalism

As a sociological discipline, functionalism is counterposed to Marxism. However it shares with Marxism the greatness of totality and the corresponding view that scientific inquiry is based upon the mutuality of parts within a whole. It is important to distinguish why the Marxian exercise of the totality differs significantly from functionalist systems. Primarily this involves the Marxian emphasis on the contradictory portion of the whole and the treatment of the social totality from the perspective of its conflicts.Functionalism in severalize views clubhouse generally as a stable system and looks for the mechanisms that split it harmony it thus learnks to reduce conflict to a residual fraction of the system, or view conflict from the perspective of its maintenance of the social system. Marxism was founded by Karl Marx. Marx saw society as divided into two major parts, the scotch base otherwise cognise as the infrastructure and the super-structure. Functionalists see socie ty as a set of parts which work together to fix a whole. Functionalism is also called a consensus theory.Marxism and functionalism are similar in that they see that the way society is structured as an important part in determining the way people have relationships and behave between themselves. This is known as structural perspective. Both functionalists and Marxists believe that people are depicted as creature within the social system. Functionalists believe that society operates to the derive of everybody. They stress that societies continue to exist because a lot of the time on that point is consensus between various aspects.