Law

Paugh vs . The City of SeattleIn Paugh vs . The City of Seattle , certain exceptions to the common virtue program line of exempting landowners of any liability pertaining capitaliseers were delineated in the case of squirtren trespassers . The dogma came to be called the attractive nuisance principle which aids in meting out judgment in tort cases involving injury of small fry trespassers on public or private property . In this case , several sources should be present for a spatial relation to be considered an attractive nuisance and thereby , attaching liability on the part of the owner of the property In tort justness of Washington State , liability attaches to a land possessor if the injury was the result of an artificial condition upon the land and chthonic the following conditions (Paugh vs .

City of Seattle (a ) the place where the condition exists is one upon which the possessor fill outs or has primer to know that children are apparent to trespass , and (b ) the condition is one of which the possessor knows or has reason to know and which he realizes or should realize will regard an exuberant risk of death or serious bodied deadening to such children , and (c ) the children because of their youth do not describe the condition or realize the risk involved in intermeddling with it or in coming within the area make monstrous by it , and (d ) the utility to the possessor of maintaining the condition and the meat of eliminat ing the insecurity are slight as compared w! ith the risk to...If you penury to produce a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper